The Science of
How Kadam Works

Every feature in Kadam is based on a specific principle from language acquisition research. This page explains what those principles are and where they appear.

Research Principles

Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
Krashen, 1982 · Nation, 2001
Reading stories and discovering new words in context

The most memorable vocabulary learning happens through encountering words in meaningful context. When a learner notices an unfamiliar word mid-story, the surrounding narrative provides clues that bind the word to memory far more effectively than a definition alone. Words learned this way are retained longer and transfer more readily to new contexts.

Input Before Output
Krashen, 1985
Stories are read before any production task begins

Krashen's Input Hypothesis argues that language is acquired when learners are exposed to comprehensible input before being asked to produce it. Therefore asking someone to form sentences using a structure they have never encountered causes them to only guess. Exposure first creates the internal model that production can then draw on. Therefore in Kadam, every quiz follows from a story.

Input phase
Read a graded story
Encounter vocabulary in use
Absorb sentence structures
Output phase
Translation tasks
Sentence formation
Word reordering

Output phase comes after the input phase

Native Language Scaffolding
Cummins, 1979 · Cook, 2001
Translation tasks between the learner's native language and the target language

Research has overturned the older view that the first language needs to be suppressed. In fact, it is a resource, as it can serve as a fully formed conceptual framework onto which new linguistic forms can be mapped. Translation also forces precision. A learner who vaguely understands a word must commit to an exact equivalent therefore revealing gaps that paraphrase tasks tend to conceal.

Metalinguistic Feedback
Lyster and Ranta, 1997 · Ellis, 2009
Hints when a formed sentence is incorrect

Not all error correction produces learning. Simply marking an answer wrong and moving on is ineffective. Metalinguistic feedback directs the learner's attention to the specific linguistic property that caused the error, without giving the correct answer outright. The learner must still do the cognitive work of repairing their output, and that effortful repair is precisely what drives restructuring of the learner's internal grammar.

Learner Self-Assessment
Oscarson, 1989 · Black and Wiliam, 1998
Rating each word easy, medium, or hard after a quiz

Evaluating one's own performance requires accessing and appraising one's knowledge state, which is the kind of reflective monitoring that distinguishes skilled learners from rote memorisers. That rating then feeds directly into review scheduling where words rated hard return sooner, and words rated easy are deferred.

Hard
Returns in 1 day
Medium
Returns in 4 days
Easy
Returns in 10 days

The learner's own judgement steers the review schedule

Metacognitive Error Review
Flavell, 1979 · Chamot, 2004
A space allocated to revisit past mistakes

Metacognition refers to a learner's awareness and regulation of their own cognitive processes. In language learning, its most direct application is error review through stepping back from the flow of practice to examine, deliberately, where knowledge breaks down.

Phonological Loop Activation
Baddeley, 1986 · Papagno et al., 1991
Read-aloud and shadowing of story sentences

Baddeley's working memory model identifies the phonological loop as the system responsible for holding and rehearsing sound-based information. Papagno and colleagues showed that blocking this loop significantly impairs foreign vocabulary learning while leaving other cognitive tasks unaffected. When a learner reads aloud or shadows an audio recording, the sound of a word, its rhythm and stress, become additional encoding channels alongside the visual form.

Hear or read word in story
Phonological store activated
Sub-vocal rehearsal loop
Long-term memory storage

Baddeley's phonological loop as a pathway into long-term memory

Structural Priming
Bock, 1986 · Pickering and Branigan, 1998
New grammar structures highlighted in stories before production tasks

When a speaker processes a sentence with a particular grammatical structure, that structure becomes temporarily more accessible and more likely to be reused in production, even with entirely different vocabulary. Kadam uses this by highlighting unfamiliar constructions during the story reading phase. When the learner then moves to a sentence-formation task, the recently encountered structure is still active in memory, making production feel more natural.

"The treaty was signed by the emperor."
passive construction activated
"The song was written by ___."
same structure, new vocabulary

Process of context absorption to production

Lexical Depth Expansion
Nation, 1990 · Qian, 2002
Word Vault unlocks multiple dictionary senses across proficiency levels

Researchers distinguish breadth (knowing many words at a surface level) from depth (knowing a word's full range of collocations, and register). At advanced levels, depth predicts reading comprehension more strongly than breadth. In Kadam's Word Vault, a word begins with its core sense. As proficiency rises from A1 to B2, additional senses are unlocked from dictionary sources and introduced in context.

Beginner
run
to move quickly on foot
Intermediate
run
to manage or operate (she runs the department)
Advanced
run
to extend or flow (the road runs north; ink runs)

One word at three proficiency tiers.